Sunday, September 23, 2012
Friday, September 21, 2012
Pixies' "Doolittle (1989)"
The Pixies’ 1989 album Doolittle
predates the “grunge” scene of the 1990s, but it was influential to many
artists and acts of that era (Sisario, 2006).
With the exception of its production qualities (an emphasis on gated
drums, for example) it did not sound like the music of the 1980s, in my opinion. Dark and disturbing lyrics, dramatic dynamic
changes between soft and loud musical motifs within the same song, and peculiar
atmospheric guitar wails are all hallmarks of the Pixies’ Doolittle, hallmarks that later became the norm with bands such as
Nirvana and Soundgarden (Sisario, 2006).
In 1994, Kurt Cobain of Nirvana fame told Rolling Stone that he “was basically trying to rip off the Pixies”
when he wrote Smells Like Teen Spirit (Sisario,
2006).
Ironically, both Pixies and their work were not entirely
successful upon release but continued sales and an expanding fan base have
eventually brought then much deserved recognition (Sisario, 2006). Doolittle
became certified gold in 1995, and approximately 800,000 to a million
copies of Doolittle were sold in
America by 2005 (Sisario, 2006). And
although the band dispersed in 1993, after much in-fighting, their growing
success brought them back together in 2004, and they have been performing off
and on since then (Sisario, 2006).
As a side-note, Doolittle
was polled by NME as the
second-greatest influential album of all time in 2003 (“Doolittle (album),”
n.d.).
I had heard of the Pixies for years but never knew much
about them. I knew they were an
alternative rock back of the late 1980s and were popular on college radio, but
other than their video for Here Comes
Your Man from Doolittle, I did
not listen to them. It was only until I
discovered that the forewoman of the band The Breeders, Kim Deal, was
originally the bassist for the Pixies that I decided to explore their
music. I was immediately drawn into
their dark and quirky world and was amazed that I had not been a listener
earlier in their career. As with their
trend, I became a fan and admirer years after Doolittle’s release.
As a professional influence, my lyrics also tend to be dark
and esoteric in nature as with Doolittle. However, I am still in the process of
learning Gil Norton’s (the producer of Doolittle)
techniques of adding a clean sheen to a raw sound without stripping the rawness
completely away. And despite the age of
the alternating dynamics of soft and loud found in 1990s music, I still enjoy
adding a contrast of dynamics in my own work.
The question I have been asked in my Music History II course
regarding my place in the industry in five years is a difficult one for
me. I suppose the best way to begin
answering this question is to state what I have learned from the various
artists throughout this course. The
commonality that comes to my mind is that all these artists were genuine and
honest with their standards. None of
them were trying to recreate albums that came before them, neither by
themselves nor by other artists. Each
artist had strengths and weaknesses and worked within the given
boundaries. Whether the limits were
technological (Kraftwerk worked with synthesizers before MIDI was available) or
personal (the trials that Marvin Gaye had to work through when creating What’s Going On), each artist managed to
produce stellar material despite the circumstances. This topic is important to me on a deeply
personal level. I know my road ahead
will be a challenging and difficult one, but I am going to make the journey as
rewarding to me as possible.
I do not project myself in the future at all, so I do not
know where I will be in the industry in five years. I do know that my passion for music and music
production keeps me open to many opportunities.
I will be happy as a freelancer creating music for various libraries, as
a soundtrack composer for film or television, or as studio producer helping
talent to record his or her material. In
the process, I will strive to keep my originality and be honest with my talents
(or lack thereof).
And my final bit of advice is to always keep learning and
evolving. If I ever feel as if I had
reached my “destination” in the music industry, it will be time for me to find
another line of work.
Shannon McDowell
Shannon McDowell
Sunday, September 16, 2012
Electronic Music Innovation: MIDI
MIDI is the acronym for Musical Instrument Device
Interface. Developed in 1982, it is a
protocol that allows separate electronic music equipment to communicate amongst
each other (History 2012). In those
early days of MIDI, the communication was rather simple: data relating to
switching a note on and off and volume control (History 2012). In time, the MIDI protocol became much more
robust with added datasets. These
datasets can control a multitude of parameters and allows a single performer to
play a rack of synthesizers and drum machine from a single MIDI controller.
The impact of such a common data language among different
electronic instruments and computers has been dramatic. MIDI incorporated in modern software, known
as Digital Audio Workstations, or DAWs, allows complex sequences to be
programmed and played back at variable settings. And MIDI controller devices can be played as
instruments to control a huge array of musical equipment. As a result, a single performer can control a
symphony of sounds.
MIDI is now used in virtually all contemporary genres of
electronic music. I am unable to think
of an example of modern electronic music production that would not employ MIDI.
As a music producer, I thrive in a MIDI environment. The DAWs that have developed over the years
have allowed me to produce music on a relatively low budget, all things
considered. I am curious about the new
MIDI controller called QuNeo and have done some preliminary research on
it. It can control several DAW
parameters via MIDI to produce sophisticated electronic music.
As for DAWs, I primarily use three different packages. These include Apple Logic Pro, Ableton Live,
and Propellerheads’ Reason. I am able to
run two DAWs at a time using another protocol called Rewire. Rewire is in essence a virtual MIDI
connection between two DAWs, which then syncs them to playback simultaneously.
Since I have used MIDI for years, much of this blog entry is
from experience and not documented sources.
So I decided to include a few links to discuss MIDI in greater detail:
The History of MIDI: http://www.midi.org/aboutmidi/tut_history.php
A Short History of MIDI: http://www.rbjones.com/rbjpub/music/mus006.htm
Shannon McDowell
Kraftwerk (1974 – 1981 Period)
Kraftwerk is a pioneering electronic music group from
Germany founded by Ralf Hütter and Florian Schneider (Duarte et al., 2011). Although they produced albums prior to 1974,
it was with their 1974 release “Autobahn” that they first received significant
attention (Duarte et al., 2011). With
this album, Kraftwerk demonstrated that electronic music had legitimacy in the
musical arts. Their presentation during
the United States 1975 tour was similar to factory workers; the members dressed
in business attire as they perform on stage (Johnstone, 2008). But Kraftwerk’s image would continue to
evolve towards an “artist as machine” motif (Duarte et al., 2011).
Starting in 1974, Kraftwerk’s albums were mainly concept in
nature. “Autobahn (1974)” concerned
itself with transportation and traffic on the Autobahn. “Radioactivity (1975)” had as its main theme an interplay
with radio technology and radiation.
“Trans Europe Express (1977)” expressed European connectivity with a
train as its metaphor. However, both
“Radioactivity” and “Trans Europe Express” were not successfully commercially
when they were released (Johnstone, 2008).
It was with their 1978 album “The Man Machine” that Kraftwerk once again
found success on the radio and clubs (Duarte et al., 2011). And in 1981, “Computer Love” was released as
celebration of computer technology.
One of the more significant aspects of Kraftwerk’s place in
popular music history is their use of cutting-edge technology. By 1978, Kraftwerk was using sequencers for
their drum patterns as well as other synthesizer instruments (Johnstone, 2008). It kept the music and their image appeal
sounding futuristic. Also, Kraftwerk’s
music grew from more experimental pieces on “Autobahn” to club-friendly singles
on “The Man Machine.” They brought
electronic music out of the labs and into the charts.
Shannon McDowell
Sunday, September 9, 2012
Marvin Gaye’s “What’s Going On (1971)”
Prior to What’s Going
On in 1971, Marvin Gaye fit the “Motown niche” – Clean-shaven and
“image-conscious fashion” (Edmond, 2001).
He already had a few hits, including “How Sweet It Is (To Be Loved By
You)” and “I Heard It Through the Grapevine”
(Marvin gaye, n.d.). His songs
were hardly controversial or involved social issues.
After his brother returned from the Vietnam War, and along
with the social unrest throughout United States during the 1960s and into the
1970s, Gaye turned his attention to social matters (Edmonds, 2001). There were riots on college campuses, reports
of police brutality were all too common, and the war was clearly taking a toll
on the country’s confidence. These
issues were the background under which What’s
Going On was produced.
Obstacles were numerous regarding the production and
pre-release of What’s Going On. One of Gaye’s collaborators was attacked by
the IRS, Gaye had difficulties within his marriage to Anna, and he suffered
from depression as well (Edmonds, 2001).
And there were skeptics against the production, feeling that Gaye was
becoming a protest artist (Edmonds, 2001).
One of the significant differences with What’s Going On and other Motown albums at that time was the
lyrical content. While far from a
militaristic protest album, the subject matter did raise awareness on a lot of
the issues that were at fault in America during the 1960s and 1970s. Furthermore, the album was released without
Berry Gordy’s blessings (Edmonds, 2001).
Sadly, I am not as familiar with the history of Motown as I
would like to be. I do know of many of
the hits that were released during the 1960s and 1970s, but I never had the
opportunity to listen to a full-length album until What’s Going On. However, I
must say I was thoroughly impressed with Gaye’s work. I was especially impressed with the reverb
and recording techniques employed throughout.
I can see why it is considered an influential album.
On a side-note, I was born the year What’s Going On was released.
I recall the use of brass and strings in contemporary music of my early
childhood. It is easy to assume that
music had always sounded that way as a child.
It is only upon researching and listening to different eras of music
that one can sense the shift in arrangements and recording arts that transpire
over time. I am thankful that Gaye’s
work is one of the requirements for Music History II. I feel as if I discovered a new artist in the
process.
Shannon McDowell
“The Velvet Underground & Nico (1967)”
The band The Velvet Underground was a project produced by
the pop artist Andy Warhol in 1967 (Howard, 2004). The “Velvets” had a pessimistic psychedelic
rock sound that contrasted with the San Francisco scene’s more upbeat tone
(Scaruffi, 1999). Songs such as “Heroin”
and “Waiting for My Man” discussed drug use in a non-judgmental, non-glamorous
manner, and “Venus in Furs,” which is based on a 19th century novel
containing sadism and masochism (“The Velvet Underground & Nico,” n.d.).
The two prominent songwriters of The Velvet Underground were
John Cale and Lou Reed. Cale’s
background was from the avant-garde world, and he was a masterful violinist
(Howard, 2004). In contrast, Reed penned
throwaway songs for Pickwick Records (Howard, 2004). Cale was interested with Reed’s lyrics and
song concepts, while Reed was fascinated with Cale’s music abilities (Howard,
2004).
As mentioned earlier, Andy Warhol supported and produced the
“Velvets.” He was already a prominent
pop artist in his own right, and he added Nico, a German model with an aloof
attitude and deadpan mannerisms, to the lineup (Howard, 2004). The album cover of their debut album featured
Warhol’s artwork of a banana. Warhol’s
history and talent is worthy of a separate blog entry altogether.
Other than the dark and brooding lyrics, The Velvet Underground & Nico was
significantly different from other albums of its day. Cale’s droning textures, using viola or
violin, Maureen Tucker’s “stone age percussion,” and the feedback of the
guitarists added to the sonic painting that was the “Velvets” (Howard, 2004). And while the album may not have been a
success in sales upon its release, the sheer raw power of the constituent
elements made it a significantly influential album (Howard, 2004).
Prior to Music History II, I had been influenced by The Velvet Underground & Nico, Andy
Warhol’s, and Lou Reed’s work. While the
current trend in modern music is to over produce an album, I like the raw and
unglamorous approach to music production.
Lou Reed and Nico prove they can record successful songs before the days
of Auto-Tune. The lyrics are extremely
“real” and not “feel good fantasies.” I
can only hope one of my productions will be a fraction of as influential as the
“Velvets” are.
Shannon McDowell
Sunday, September 2, 2012
The Beatles' "Revolver (1966)"
Prior to the release of The Beatles’ Rubber Soul in December of 1965, the band was mostly known as a
“boy band” with light pop songs such as “Please Please Me,” “I Want to Hold
Your Hand,” “A Hard Day’s Night,” and “Can’t Buy Me Love” (“The Beatles,” n.d.). Already an international phenomena, The
Beatles had been in two movies, A Hard
Day’s Night in 1964, and Help! in
1965 (“The Beatles,” n.d.). With the
release of Rubber Soul, they began to
shift their focus to more serious-minded songs.
However, it was during the recording of Revolver in 1966, that The Beatles began to explore new techniques
in music production, as well as to experiment with hallucinogenic compounds
such as L.S.D. and intertwine Eastern philosophies into their lyrics (Newman,
n.d.). These new influences marked a
significant departure from their earlier recordings. The song “Got to Get You into My Life” was
Paul McCartney’s “ode to pot (“Revolver” (album),” n.d.).” “She Said She Said” was inspired by an
incident with Peter Fonda on L.S.D. (Newman, n.d.). And “Tomorrow Never Knows” took concepts and
ideas from Dr. Timothy Leary’s The Psychedelic
Experience (Newman, n.d.). The
result of these songs, as well as others from the album, made Revolver a milestone for The
Beatles. The days of “Love Me Do” were
over.
Another dramatic shift for the band was their use of the
studio. Engineer Geoff Emerick pioneered
audio effects that were not used in earlier recordings by any known band. For example, he put a sweater in Ringo
Starr’s bass drum to dampen the sound (Howard, 2004). Tape loops were also employed, as well as
reversing the tape’s playback (Howard, 2004).
And instruments were recorded through compressors and limiters,
something that the modern day producer now takes for granted (Howard, 2004). These were the days before digital
synthesizers and samplers. Experimental
sounds had to be developed through ingenuity and trial-and-error.
As a fan of The Beatles since early childhood, I have always
been fascinated with Revolver. While I did not conceptualize the
significance of this album, I knew instinctively that it was a brilliant piece
of artistry. The combination of George
Martin’s production skills and Emerick’s engineering techniques had developed
The Beatles’ sound into something original and unique for its day. And now as a future music producer, I think
of music in terms of emotional sonic palettes.
While I am still not quite a George Martin or Geoff Emerick, I do try to
experiment more with sound design outside of the digital realm. In the end, the influence of albums such as Revolver has made an impact on my work,
albeit in a limited fashion to date.
Hopefully my future productions will reflect the knowledge I have gained
from an album like Revolver.
Shannon McDowell
Saturday, September 1, 2012
The Beach Boys' "Pet Sounds (1966)"
In 1966, The Beach Boys took a departure from their standard
surfing songs and songs about girls with their album Pet Sounds. This remarkable
album explored new themes and different styles and arrangements of music.
Prior to Pet Sounds,
The Beach Boys’ typical hits included songs such as “Surfin’ Safari,” “Surfer
Girl,” “I Get Around,” and “Help Me, Rhonda” (“The Beach Boys,” n.d.). These
songs exemplify their light and upbeat sound, as well as depict life in
southern California where they originated.
And while these songs became classics on their own merits, many of the
themes are basically simple and lack serious emotional content.
Brian Wilson, the multi-talented foreman of The Beach Boys,
was the engine that kept the band moving.
He was not only a singer and guitarist but also the composer, arranger,
and producer of their albums (Carlin, 2009).
Due to the pressures he was under to produce, record, and tour, in 1964,
he had experienced severe emotional distress and removed himself from touring
with the other members (Fusilli, 2005). While recovering from mental exhaustion, he
began the work that would lead to the production of Pet Sounds.
With The Beatles’ release of Rubber Soul in 1965, Wilson was inspired to create a similar work
that consisted of all original tracks that blended together to form a cohesive
sound (Carlin, 2009). Wilson’s growing
skills and knowledge of recording techniques paved the way to develop such an
album.
Pet Sounds begins
with a seemingly light-hearted theme with the song, “Wouldn’t It Be Nice?” But as Jim Fusilli (2005) wrote in the 33 1/3: Pet Sounds:
…at the end
of the fourth bar, Hal Blaine…smacks the drums hard, delivering
a harsh,
ominous sound that echoes like a shut door, a slammed gate (p. 41).
Such a sonic statement underlines a more serious tone to an
otherwise innocent song. These embellishments
were used throughout Pet Sounds,
painting mental images that were not found in prior works by The Beach Boys.
Furthermore, the sonic palette had grown considerably for Pet Sounds. Still with the first song, instruments such
as four guitars, three saxophones and a trumpet, two accordions, bells, plucks
from the strings of a piano, and a timpani formed part of the backing tracks
(Fusilli, 2005). Such arrangements were
obviously influenced by working with Phil Spector’s “Wall-of-Sound” production
process (Carlin, 2009). Such
arrangements created a significantly larger sound than the original five-piece
rock band of The Beach Boys.
Another departure from their earlier work consists of
lyrical play. In the love song, “God
Only Knows,” the opening line is, “I may not always love you.” This atypical line for an intro of a love
song was followed with lines that negated its context; thus, it stresses that
the singer will always love the recipient of the song.
Prior to Music History II, I have heard Pet Sounds several times, both in its original mono format and the
remastered stereo tracks. While I
enjoyed it tremendously, I was not aware of how groundbreaking it was. I was born five years after the release of Pet Sounds, and the techniques and
arrangements that made it a pioneering album were now commonplace in the music
I grew up with in the 1970s. But with
fresh ears, I realize just what a major undertaking it was to produce such a
work of art. As a future music producer,
I was to learn more about how he layered the different instruments to keep the
backing tracks uncluttered yet rich in sound.
Since studying Pet
Sounds, I have a new respect and admiration for Brian Wilson’s exceptional
musical talents.
Shannon McDowell
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)